Friday, March 4, 2016

All About Identity Theft

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Identity theft is a serious crime affecting millions of people a year and accounting for the loss of billions of dollars every year as well. Find out more about identity theft, what it is, and how thieves go about stealing an identity on our What Is Identity Theft? page. You may also be interested in reading more about the history of identity theft and checking out some identity theft statistics to further understand this crime and its consequences. Also find out more about comprehensive identity theft protection and correction resources for individuals and businesses.


Now that you realize the seriousness of identity theft and the potential it has to affect your own life, you probably want to be clear about the signs of identity theft so that you can tell if you’ve been victimized. You probably also want to learn all about identity theft protection and prevention so you can reduce your own risk of becoming a victim. Find out how to protect your personal information, keep your cards, documents, and passwords safe, and monitor your financial accounts and credit information as major steps to keeping yourself safe from identity theft. You may also want to look into identity theft insurance to feel extra secure. Hiring a reliable shredding company to dispose of unwanted confidential information is a great way to prevent identity theft.


You may also be wondering what to do if your identity is stolen in case you ever become a victim of identity theft. Although it is a long, arduous process to restore your life back to normal after your identity has been stolen, it’s possible if you know what to do, especially if you’ve already been practicing our tips on identity theft protection and prevention.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]



All About Identity Theft

How to Use Facebook to Track your Friends' Sleep

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]A software developer in Denmark has created a way to track the sleep patterns of his Facebook friends using only the activity data available on the social network. The tool, developed by Søren Louv-Jansen, is based on the activity timestamps that Facebook stores on users of its site and Messenger app. Because many people check Facebook in the morning and before they go to bed at night, Louv-Jansen was able to piece together information on their sleeping habits (though it only works for frequent users).


Louv-Jansen has published the source code for his tool on GitHub, and explained how it works it in a Medium post last week. Using the software to check Facebook’s database on user activity every ten minutes, he created graphics depicting his friends’ sleep patterns, and discovered some broad trends, as well. His friends’ sleep was largely regular throughout the work week, for example, and more erratic on the weekend.[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”1080″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]Facebook apparently isn’t happy about it. In an interview with The Washington Post, Louv-Jansen said the company asked him to discourage others from using his software, saying that it violates the site’s terms of service. (At least 1,000 people have already downloaded the code, he added.) But the developer has refused to remove it from GitHub, saying he created it as a way to raise awareness around how much personal information can be gleaned from freely available information.


“My point was not to spy on my friends,” Louv-Jansen tells the Post. “I want people to be aware that they’re leaving some digital footsteps everywhere they go.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]



How to Use Facebook to Track your Friends' Sleep

Thursday, March 3, 2016

State Control Revelations

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]I’m lying in bed with insomnia, and I’m realizing something.


I hope this makes sense cause I’m not thinking straight, but it seems to make sense right now in my head.


Question: Have you ever run an interaction, gotten a good initial reaction, and ejected before it could go bad? Why do we do this? Are we so wanting to stay in the good mood that we established by getting a decent initial reaction from the chick, that we’d sacrifice a possible lay just to take the SURE THING that we’ll stay in a good mood? Are we really like that? Answer: I think that psychologically, we all cope by building a self-image for ourselves.


Teenagers will turn goth, or prep, or find cliques, or get really into a pro sports team, or get really into a certain type of music, or get involved with drugs.


We did this stuff because we struggled to find our own IDENTITY.


As we get older, we find our own identity and it’s typically more sophisticated than when we were younger, but it’s still how we GET BY psychologically (so I suppose it’s no better, but just further developed… still, it gives us the illusion of superiority, which is really good enough anyway, but I’m digressing)


NOBODY likes to think of themselves as “bad with women”, because we NEED to feel desirable as a FUNDAMENTAL part of our self-identity.


To feel undesirable sexually would imply MANY MANY BAD THINGS about ourselves, including bad genetics, bad personality, bad social intelligence, and many BAD BAD THINGS.


This is why when you tell guys about the community, they freak out and get all pissy. Because to imply that they would need HELP with their desirability is to imply MANY bad things about them.


That’s why guys who you can be cool to talk about practically ANYTHING with (perfectly cool guys when it comes to ANY other topic than this) can’t take it when you say “hey man check out this forum about pickup”


 Now, key here is that the main problem with STATE CONTROL is that when we approach a woman, our fear is MASSIVELY ILLOGICAL.


In fact, fear is built to prevent us from being HURT. But IRONICALLY our FEAR of approaching women actually HURTS US, while ACTUALLY approaching HELPS US.


But yet, we feel fear.


The reason that we feel fear is that is is our way of psychologically preventing ourselves from having a self-image crash.


Our ego can’t stand the punishment.


We have a self-image that we’ve developed, and it sure doesn’t include being a guy who women SNUB.


It’s the same reason that guys who don’t really go out to approach but still have been in the community for a while and have good knowledge will get all pissy at the guys who really approach. They’ve developed a self image that they are good with women, which they foster and nurture through internet forums by spreading good knowledge, despite their own lack of EXPERIENCE. So when guys question them or post something that contrasts their theoretical knowledge, they get all pissed off and grumpy and whiny, because what they are reading is DISTURBING the internet- based system that makes them feel good with women, and therefore about themselves.


But back to the main point, in my opinion a big key to state-control is recognition of fact that our fear is based on the threat to our self image (or ego).


Then, in recognition of this phenomenon, we have to re-assess our self-image NOT to include our desirability to women.


Why?


Because we realize that practically NO guys, even good looking, are actually able to pick up random women on a consistent basis, in the way that we’re learning to do here.


And in recognition of this reality about the world, we can accept that practically nobody is good with women, and free ourselves to do mass approaches and learn the skill-set.


We have to see things as they are, and therefore free ourselves of the threat to our self image, since we understand that there is no correlation between our self-image and any particular sarge.


In fact, our self-image should even become bruised when we chicken-out from approaches, because that is the real thing to be ashamed of, given that there is so little correlation between our desirability and our actual ability to pick up new random women, given the current social context of women being empowered. Having fear implies that we are stupid, because we aren’t able to make the link between reality and how it doesn’t actually correspond to our self-image in the way that we seem to need to delude ourselves into thinking it does (in desperate attempt to preserve our emotional well-being).


And in this re-assessment of our self-image, we can realize that fear of playing pick up is instantly dealt with.


We can even apply this to many areas of our lives, and at least make the effort to recognize the many areas that we delude ourselves, and to try to gain self-knowledge that will bring us closer to equilibrium in our environments and the world that we’ve been thrown into.


The more that we acknowledge where we’ve deluded ourselves for the sole sake of preserving a false self-image, the more we can improve ourselves in the real world, and not just in our heads.


Why do this? Because on a subconscious level we know that we’re lying to ourselves, and it comes through in the form of depression.


So by aspiring and genuinely attempting to recognize this and to gain self knowledge, we begin to purge ourselves of this bullshit, and begin to emit an aura that people will want to be around.


Notice how some people just rub you the wrong way, but you can’t explain why? Notice there are some guys that everyone just wants to be around?


These guys are the ones who have come closer to this equilibrium with the real world and the one that they perceive in their minds.


And these kind of guys have potential to be amazing PUAs, because they have ultimate state- control.


They are ultimately comfortable with THEMSELVES, and it comes through with women.


P.S. Side note:


This is just like in clubs.


Go into a club, and it’s so disorienting. Music, people, dance, drinks.


But go into that same club during the daytime, and then right as they turn on the music and lights, and it looks stupid. It’s just the illusion that fucks us up.


So when you’re in a club, try to be like Neo in “The Matrix”, and see the club as nothing more than a room with annoyingly loud music and annoying lights and people acting stupid and silly. Then the intimidation factor of clubs goes away.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]



State Control Revelations

Chode's Manifesto

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Hi there. I am a chode.


I don’t go for location change within the venue with every girl I approach because I think it’s not going well enough.


I don’t try to extract every girl that I approach out of the venue because I think it’s not going well enough.


I don’t try to kiss and get physical with every girl I approach because I think it’s not going well enough.


…I tried these things a few times, but the girls said ‘no’.. So I figured it would be better not to try unless I was more sure that they’d be OK with it. I think a lot about these things…


I don’t have a way to initiate physicality or kissing other than just waiting until it feels right.


I don’t go for numbers with every girl I approach because I think the approach has to be “solid” for her not to flake me.


I don’t get an average of 15 to 30 numbers a week like a normal guy as a result. Gurus say they only get 2 numbers a week to get laid, and I think I’m at that level.


I don’t keep track of the girls numbers that I took when I got home, by writing down a sentence or two worth of details, so I can’t remember which number belongs to which girl.


I don’t have any idea of what I would do with a girl if she came out for a day2.


I don’t have a plan of where I would extract a girl to if she agreed to leave the club with me. I figure I’d just say “Let’s go back to my place.” I don’t know what I should push for.


I don’t call and follow up hard with every girl whose number I get, and refuse to go out until I have called and left messages with every number on my list. I just go out and gather more numbers, instead of viewing going out as a reward for already having called all my numbers.


I give up on a girl if she doesn’t call back first time.


I give up on a girl if she doesn’t agree to a second meet the first time.


I don’t use the girls who are flaking me as a chance to practice my conversational skills when they pick up the phone. In fact, I’m not a good conversationalist on the phone because I don’t get enough practice at it.


I don’t realize that most girls you approach will give you their number regardless of if it went well or not, and even if I do realize it I figure that it’s wood anyway so I don’t try.


I don’t try to isolate every girl that I go on day 2s with.


I don’t even have a plan of how to get a girl isolated, such as something at my house to give a reason to go back there.


I don’t carry condoms with me when I go out because it isn’t in my reality that I can get laid.


I don’t understand what a cool guy looks like, because I walk around in a chode trance all day instead of looking at all the cool people around me and thinking about what makes them cool.


I think that only PUAs are cool, and that I can’t learn from all the more normal people I’m seeing all the time because they aren’t “sargers” and I can’t distinguish what a naturally compelling personality looks like.


I don’t identify with cool people, and even dislike them because I think they’re conceited.


I view every interaction as a chance to take value from people. When I read posts, I complain that I didn’t get the details that I wanted or that the paragraphs weren’t right or that it was too short or long. When I talk to bouncers, I just want to know if their club is good instead of joking around with them and thinking about how I’m making them feel as I talk to them. And when I see PUAs with their girls I write posts about how they aren’t hot enough for my high standards and how they didn’t look cool themselves, because I have such a low and insignificant view of myself that I implicitly think that I couldn’t hurt their feelings and even if I did I’d like it because then they’d relate to how I feel. I don’t view interactions as a way to make people feel good or to express creativity, but instead as a way to take value so that I don’t sink.


I like to criticize things because I don’t view myself as having value to offer in any other regard, and I figure being critical is like pole-vaulting off of someone else. When I read the internet I love to write posts like “Read the fucking manual” or “this is not advanced enough for the advanced forum”, and it has never occurred to me that even if I’m right, cool guys would never waste their lives posting this pointless shit, and I don’t realize that these kinds of actions are implicitly reinforcing to my subconscious mind that I’m a chode with nothing substantial to offer.


I like to think I’m being manipulated by paragraphs like the one above, to delude myself that my validation is even worth having a conspiracy to get in the first place. I am fully convinced that my hater personality is justified and that the world is a fucked up place and that I’m just calling it like I see it. The world conspires against me because I am significant. I always find the negative, and I’m closed off to learning because seeing things as they are would be too painful.


I go out to “sarge” and because of that I’m in a logical state the entire time I’m out.


I don’t know how to have a non-logical conversation, because it’s outside my comfort zone. When I hang around with community guys, I like to talk game like a nerd scientist. In fact, when I meet other community guys I talk about GAME because I don’t know how to relate to them on non- logical topics.


I am disconnected from reality, so I can’t understand what game looks like because even when I see it I can’t process it through my chode fog.


I also don’t want to try anything new, like keeping track of my eye contact and voice projection and deliberate use of humour and good energy in ALL my interactions, because I’d have to break out of my chode trance and because unless I’m SARGING I don’t view it as an interaction to use good social skills in.


I blame the people who should have given me the magic pill I wanted for my failure even though I have not done any of these things.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]



Chode's Manifesto

Breaking Down Muscle-Building Myths - Part 1

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Modern bodybuilding, just like any other sport, is mired by widespread misinformation or “myths” that can discourage a budding bodybuilder from pursuing his muscle-bound dreams.


If you are a beginner or if you’re thinking of joining the ranks of amateur or professional bodybuilders, it’s important that you arm yourself against these myths so you can focus on what really matters – developing your physique, building strength and improving your overall performance.


The First Set of Myths


1. “If You Stop Exercising, Your Muscles Will Melt and Transform Into Flab” – First of all, muscle tissue and fat tissue are two completely different things. Fat and muscle have a special relationship as fat can supply the body with energy for building muscle. However, to say that muscle can eventually “meld back” into fat is plain wrong.


This myth was probably derived by the naysayers from the common bodybuilding mantra “turn than fat into hard muscle”. Of course, we all know that this is just pure marketing language. The people who write such words on magazines and websites just want to encourage people to buy supplements or to sign up for a new weight loss system. It shouldn’t be taken literally!


If you take this mantra seriously, the logical reversal would be “turn that hard muscle into fat!” or something similar.


I can almost hear some of you saying “I’ve met someone who went to the gym for a while and stopped. He/she is fat now”. Well, yes this does happen but no because muscle transforms into fat but because people burn fewer calories than what they consume on a daily basis. The basic science behind calories is simple: if you eat 5,000 calories a day and you only burn off 1,500 calories, you will have an excess 3,500 calories.


If you don’t burn off the extra calories, the body stores the excess energy into fat. The body tries its best to distribute fat evenly but most of the time, a large percentage of fat ends up in a person’s midsection.


2. “You’ll Be Covered With So Much Muscle After Lifting Weights” – Building mass like professional bodybuilders requires tremendous effort. Some people are naturally big and that’s a plus if you’re going the “all natural” route. But for 99.99% of the competitive bodybuilding population, this is simply not the case; let’s leave it at that!


If you want to try bodybuilding because you want to become strong and lean then by all means, do it. If your diet is sensible and you have a certified trainer supporting your efforts, you will most likely end up lean and strong, just like you planned.


Another “muscle-bound myth” is that after gaining so much lean muscle mass, you won’t even be able to bend properly to perform common tasks. Some people even joke that a bodybuilder can lift 300 pounds but he can’t scratch his back anymore.


Again, there’s no truth at all with these myths. One of the strongest points of bodybuilding is the development of tremendous flexibility. If you watch professional bodybuilders warming you will be amazed at how easily a gargantuan bodybuilder can bend forward at the waist and stretch like a professional yoga instructor.


However, I do have to warn you about poor quality workouts. If you don’t perform repetitive movements properly, you can either damage your muscles or seriously compromise your flexibility. If you end up compromising your flexibility because you lack proper instruction or you were too preoccupied doing things “your way”, then the fault lies entirely in how you performed the exercises. We can’t possibly blame the activity of weight lifting and the sport of bodybuilding for the preventable faults of a few practitioners.


3. “You’ll Get Really Big But You’ll Become Very Weak in the Process” – There is a very harmful myth that has been circulating for many years now about competitive bodybuilders being “their weakest” during the few weeks leading to a major competition.


This may be due to the fact that professional bodybuilders perform “cut fatting” routines to ensure ideal form and this can truly deplete a person physically.


However, if you look at the situation logically the fatigue comes from too much effort and not because these people are bodybuilders. Some become somewhat weak because they train too hard – that’s not something that they should be criticized for.


Also, it is exceedingly common for pro-level bodybuilders to be able to bench press half a ton of weights. Ronnie Coleman can easily curl 200+ dumbbells in his “warm up” routines![/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]



Breaking Down Muscle-Building Myths - Part 1

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

5 Live Linux Desktop Distributions You Should Know




Linux is such a unique beast. The flagship open source platform does things no other operating system can do. Case in point…the live distribution. What is a live distribution? Simple. By running completely from RAM, a live Linux distribution allows you to run a full instance of the operating system (from either CD/DVD or USB) without making changes to your current system.


What does this mean to you? It means you can either use a live distribution to test whether Linux is right for you, or you can carry around a Linux distribution to use at your discretion. Don’t want to boot into a Windows computer? Fine. Pull out your trusty live Linux USB drive and boot up your distribution of choice.


But, which distributions make for the best live experience? That’s a challenging question, and one that is clearly susceptible to bias. One user’s favorite distribution is another’s most hated. What I have done is collect the five distributions I believe show off the idea of live Linux best. These are not intended to be live distributions for administrators (like, for example, PartedMagic, Clonezilla, or SystemRescueCD). This list is all about booting into a full-fledged Linux desktop that can serve your needs and serve them well.


With that said, here are my top five Linux distributions that work well in a live format.








Ubuntu Desktop


UBUNTU

Ubuntu heads up my list of Live distros for several reasons. The main reason is easy—Ubuntu, as a live distribution, makes an incredible tool for showing off what Linux can do, and this idea actually goes beyond the individual to serve as a means for spreading the word. Ubuntu is one of the best distributions for hardware detection and support, so you know when you boot that Ubuntu USB into live mode, everything is going to work and work well. On top of that, you wind up with a gorgeous desktop that is as user-friendly as any other.

Along with the hardware support and the modern desktop, Ubuntu also comes with everything you need right out of the box: browser, office suite, email, multimedia — the things every average user requires to get the job done.


You might also be questioning my choice of including a larger-footprint distribution. The reason for this is simple: Nearly every modern computer has the horsepower to run even the likes of Ubuntu, as a live distribution, flawlessly. So, why not take advantage of that power and boot up a distribution that has everything you need.





Netrunner Desktop


NETRUNNER

Netrunner Linux focuses on the KDE Plasma environment and comes preinstalled with several surprising tools. On top of the standard fare, you’ll also find the likes of Skype, Wine, Gimp, VLC, Steam, and VirtualBox (Note: Steam and VirtualBox cannot effectively run from a live environment), and much more.

Netrunner comes in two different flavors: A standard release and a rolling release. The standard release is based on Debian package management and the rolling release centers around Arch package management. One reason I chose Netrunner over another KDE-based distribution is that they’ve successfully managed to optimize KWin to run on lower-powered machines (making it ideal for a live distribution). Netrunner also adds a handy side panel (along with the standard KDE panel) to give you access to multimedia controls. You’ll find plenty of themes and customizations available in Netrunner that you won’t find in other, standard, KDE distributions.





BunsenLabs Linux Desktop


BUNSENLABS LINUX

Remember CrunchBang Linux? Well, that project is dead. Fortunately, the project was picked up and given life as BunsenLabs Linux. What is this distribution all about? BunsenLabs Linux is built on Debian Jessie and uses the Openbox window manager (with the addition of the tint2 panel and Conky system monitor).

What is great about BunsenLabs Linux is that it’s a tinkerer’s dream. It comes complete with plenty of themes and Conky configurations so you can make the desktop look and feel exactly how you want…all the while not dragging your machine to a slow, grinding halt. You’ll find plenty of ideas for customization in the BunsenLabs user forums. BunsenLabs Linux can run on 32-bit, 64-bit, and even ARM-based machines!





Porteus Desktop


PORTEUS


Porteus is a unique take on the small footprint Linux distribution (it’s under 300 MB), in that it is modular in nature. Unlike most Linux distributions that work with a package manager, Porteus uses precompiled modules that can be quickly inserted into the running operating system. When you’re done with a module, you can deactivate it, so it is then removed from the directory structure. With this system, you only use what you need and nothing else can bog down the platform. You can download modules and store them locally, to be used when needed. Porteus is also stored in a squashed format, so it decompresses very quickly. Additionally, all of the boot scripts have been retooled to greatly increase startup and shutdown speeds, so you have the makings for an ideal live Linux experience.






AV Linux Desktop


AV Linux

First, let me warn you that AV Linux is not currently available. The developer has removed version 6.0.4 and is getting ready to release AV Linux 2016. It will be worth the wait. Even though I said I wasn’t including task-specific Linux distributions, this one is a bit different. AV Linux is a distribution specifically designed to be, as you might have guessed, an audio/video/graphics content creation platform.

AV Linux is not your usual distribution. Instead, it is a preconfigured snapshot of the Debian testing distribution (the current testing Debian release is called Stretch). With this distribution, you’ll find an Xfce 4 desktop and all the software you’ll need to create audio and video (including a custom Linux “RT” kernel and the Jack Audio Connection Kit, for low-latency). Among the multimedia-centric software offerings, you will find: Ardour, Audacity, Blender, Cinelerra, Handbrake, Hydrogen, Kdenlive, MuseScore, OpenShot, and VLC Media Player. I hope we’ll see AV Linux 2016 release very soon. If you’re of the creative sort, you owe it to yourself to check out AV Linux.




And there you have it; five Linux distributions that make for an outstanding live experience. Download one (or all of these) and create a portable, live Linux drive that will ensure you have your desktop of choice with you at all times.






5 Live Linux Desktop Distributions You Should Know

Want to run Windows programs on Linux? Meet CrossOver!




Just because there’s a Windows application you must use doesn’t mean you must run Windows. CodeWeaver‘s CrossOver Linux enables you to run many popular Windows applications on Linux. Supported Windows applications include Microsoft Office (from Office 97 to Office 2010), Intuit Quicken, and some versions of Adobe Photoshop and Photoshop CS. CrossOver also runs games. For example, you can play such popular online games as World of Warcraft and Guild Wars.







Sure, with powerful enough hardware you could run your Windows applications on Linux inside a virtual machine (VM) such as Oracle’s VirtualBox. The problem with these is that they don’t run well on systems with limited resources. If CrossOver supports the applications you need you won’t need to worry with fitting a VM.


CrossOver runs many but not all Windows programs. For example, you can run Visio 2010 on CrossOver Linux. AutoCAD? Not so much.


Will your program run on Linux, or for that matter CrossOver Mac? CrossOver keeps a complete listing of what runs, and what doesn’t. You can also try CrossOver with a 15-day free trial to make sure the software you need works well on a Linux system.


CrossOver is based on the open-source project Wine, an implementation of the Windows application programming interface (API) on top of the Unix/Linux operating system family. Wine is a mature project with 20 plus years of work behind it.


Technically, you don’t need CrossOver Linux to run Windows applications on Linux. You can do it with Wine alone — if you know what you’re doing. CrossOver gives you automated installation of Windows applications and technical support. In short, CrossOver makes it much easier to install and manage Windows applications on Linux


CrossOver 15, the latest version, is available as a 15-day free trial. If you like it will cost $59.95. It comes with 12 months of upgrades and technical support. CrossOver is supported on Debian, Fedora, Mint, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and Ubuntu. It should work on any Linux, but these are the officially supported distributions. CrossOver requires almost nothing from your PC except that it be capable of running Linux. Any PC from the last five years will have no trouble running it.


There’s also a good free program, PlaysOnLinux, which duplicates some of CrossOver’s functionality but doesn’t have much support. If you’re new to Linux, CrossOver is the best way to go. Since you can try it for free, you’ll know before you buy whether it supports your favorite Windows applications.








Crossover Office





CrossOver runs on pretty much any x86 Linux system. To install the program, you simply download the appropriate version for your version of Linux — Mint in my case — and open the downloaded file. This will bring up the Package Installer. Then simply click on the “Install Package” button and you’ll be on your way.


Once that’s done, installing Windows applications tends to be easy. From the CrossOver interface, you just choose which Windows applications you want from the list of supported applications. Then you point the installer to the installtion file or CD/DVD and soon things will look just like they do when you install a Windows program, on Windows.


You can also install applications that are not “officially” supported. For example, I always put one of my favorite HTML editors, NoteTab, on Linux even though it’s not officially supported.







You can also add useful Windows components to CrossOver/Linux aside from actual applications. For example, I install the most common Windows fonts, such as Arial and Times Roman.


Some applications will require that you install some Linux components as well. Usually there are 32-bit libraries that you’ll need even if you’re running a 64-bit version of Linux. The CrossOver installation program gives you detailed instructions on when and how to do this.


In my experience with CrossOver, which goes back for more than a decade now, I’ve found that most supported Windows programs run well on CrossOver. Don’t get me wrong, it doesn’t run all Windows programs. Also, I sometimes find graphic glitches, with Linux and the Windows app fighting for the same screen space.


Those are minor issues. Each version runs Windows apps better. I’ve found CrossOver to be very useful, especially on low-powered systems.


So, if you have one special Windows program you must still run, Linux or no, CrossOver could be exactly what you need.






Want to run Windows programs on Linux? Meet CrossOver!